Ignorance is not a form of 'proof'

So I've given into popular request, and the guilty pleasure of giving VFX, now dubbed PCS another spanking.
It's a point that I've been meaning to take up for some time now, his fundamentally flawed arguments from ignorance that:
1) Time can be treated in a Euclidian fashion (something that been known to be wrong for about 80 yrs), and this proves his god exists(?)
2) That just because his fantasies involve time not always existing, as does the big bang, that this somehow makes the credibility of the big bang theory equally applicable to his voyage of fantasy.
Footage from the beautyintheuniverse channel
http://www.youtube.com/user/beautyintheuniverse